Stars explained: * A production of no real merit with failings in all areas. ** A production showing evidence of not enough time or effort, or even talent, and which never breathes any real life into the piece – or a show lumbered with a terrible script. *** A good enjoyable show which might have some small flaws but has largely achieved what it set out to do.**** An excellent show which shows a great deal of work and stage craft with no noticeable or major flaws.***** A four star show which has found that extra bit of magic which lifts theatre to another plane.
Half stars fall between the ratings

ponty top

Pontypool

Hall Green Little Theatre

****

Words. They define us, they can knock us down or lift us up, express love or hate, warn of danger or delight but at the end of the day, as the old saying has it, sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me . . .

That homily of reassurance was called into question by Canadian author Tony Burgess' 1998 novel, Pontypool Changes Everything which changed to just Pontypool for the 2008 Canadian horror film, which, like the book, was set, appropriately, in Pontypool, Ontario. 

It then morphed into a radio play and from there Welsh writer Hefin Robinson adapted it for the stage and moved it 3,500 miles or so to Monmouthshire and the Welsh town the Canadian setting was named after, with its debut performance over Halloween last year.

A year on and the eve of All Hallow's Day fast approaching again, director Katie Hughes has nudged the play up the M5 to the edge of the Midlands to give us locations, and police forces we can recognise making the words - words again – more relevant.

We open in the run-down basement studio of local station Beacon Radio, CLSY 660 with their relatively new shock jock Grant Mazzy, doing his best to build an audience with a theory that being controversial and challenging, some might even say more annoying, his listeners is the way to go. He is one of the, should we say, more enthusiastic radio presenters who works on the basis of why use one word when a dozen or more, delivered scattergun style, will do. It is a wonderful performance from Shaun Dodd.

With Grant chucking his constant stream of observations and buzz words – words again – into the ether, his hard-pressed producer Sydney Briar tries to keep him vaguely on track and tries manfully to persuade him to switch to weather and traffic reports and to read out school closures because of heavy snow – the bread and butter of local radio . . .

Alice Abrahall provides a sensible, reasoned foil to Grant's flights of fancy and excesses, a safe pair of hands and even safer is Jasmine Taha as the technical assistant Laurel Ann Drumoond, ex-forces with a tour of Afghanistan to her name.

mic

So, we have Grant waffling on about . . . . who knows what . . . . presumably someone out there was listening. and we have had the weather, -5degC folks - and the traffic, building up northbound on the M5, and . . . . well there was some dispute about fishing at Earlswood Lakes but that came to nothing and then Ken in the Sunshine Chopper, the station's eye in the sky, reports a gathering crowd outside the surgery of Dr Flora Mendez.

We never see Ken, just hear him, voiced by David Hirst. He is our eyes on the world outside the studio, the real world . . . or is it?

Now when the gathering starts to turn . . . . well fatalities are not really what you expect in small town demonstrations, Ken's Sunshine Chopper rapidly loses height and crashes down to earth, all helping to expose the myths words can create, the pictures they can build up and plant in our minds.

We know about auto suggestion, the use of subliminal messaging, not exactly illegal but frowned upon in advertising and political broadcasts, but what if the words were not carrying a simple message . . . . but were the message, and not just to influence, to suggest, but to control, to dictate . . . the simple act of communication being corrupted into a cataclysmic nightmare?

Come the second act and Dr Mendez has escaped the mob outside her surgery and is in the studio trying to make sense of the mayhem unfolding outside while in the control room Laurel has heard, or said, or written or screamed her mind away. Whatever the wrong words can do, whatever they trigger or blight she is now a violent, lost victim.

Joanne Newton is a nervous Dr Mendez, an expert in . . . we never do find out her speciality, but at least she seems to speak with some authority in the mass hysteria, mob violence, killing and apocalyptic scenes outside. She paces around, trying to explain and understand what is going on, studying the rapidly changing and deteriorating Laurel, trapped behind glass in the locked control room.

Ken, our man on the ground, which is all he ever really was as Beacon tried desperately to sound more than it ever was, is becoming less reliable as a reporter at large while Jasmine, is becoming more and more possessed by, well, whatever word fits . . . it is a stunning performance not for the squeamish.

The tension builds up slowly and as we never leave the studio all the information comes by phone ins and people outside. Nothing is ever corroborated; we rely entirely on voices from outside to tell us what is going on.

Reality is what the voices tell us, and do we trust them or believe them . . .  who knows?

The set is simple, two desks, one for presenter, one for production, either side of the glass dividing wall and a special mention for Emily Beaton with make up that would not look out of place in a mediaeval torture chamber.

There are some gaping holes in the plot, but the general message is that words are not necessarily what they seem and what we are told might not necessarily be the truth . . . as a cursory glance at Twitter or X will prove. The words will be dangerous to 01-11-25. 

Roger Clarke

29-10-25

Home Reviews A-Z Reviews by affiliate